不但没有警告而且运行没事，哈哈哈哈，GCC太智能了。回复 xinglp
wzlxx_ 发表于 2010-06-07 19:50
然后我就想是不是因为GCC为我们做的太多了，这样好吗？这样会不会让我们太依赖它，如果我们要用到其他编译器了怎么办？请大家说说自己的看法
不但没有警告而且运行没事，哈哈哈哈，GCC太智能了。回复 8# xinglp 不但没有警告而且运行没事，哈哈哈哈，GCC太智能了。回复 xinglp
wzlxx_ 发表于 2010-06-07 19:50
我就是忘记了这一点才弄看了半天代码没有发现呢，G++编译过的可执行文件似乎没有多次free，程序运行的很正常，不过潜在的问题我不知道。不过同样的代码在VC6.0根本无法执行By default, class objects can be copied. In particular, a class object can be initialized with a copy of another object of the same class. This can be done even where constructors have been declared.
By default, the copy of a class object is a copy of each member. If that default is not the behavior wanted for a class X, a more appropriate behavior can be provided by defining a copy constructor, X::X(const X&).
By Bjarne Stroustrup
If the class definition does not explicitly declare a copy constructor and there is no user-declared move
constructor, a copy constructor is implicitly declared as defaulted (8.4). Thus, for the class definition
struct X { X(const X&, int);
};
a copy constructor is implicitly-declared. If the user-declared constructor is later defined as
X::X(const X& x, int i =0) { /∗ ... ∗/ }
then any use of X’s copy constructor is ill-formed because of the ambiguity; no diagnostic is required.
12.8 Copying and moving class objects, Programming Languages — C++, ISO/IEC JTC1 SC22 WG21 N 3092
这个gcc vc 都没关系吧
本来就是默认的复制构造函数
应该是glibc 好 没让你马上挂。 我这里有个bu ...
benjiam 发表于 2010-06-08 11:29
说的对beyond_touch 发表于 2010-06-08 10:24
| 欢迎光临 Chinaunix (http://bbs.chinaunix.net/) | Powered by Discuz! X3.2 |
