Chinaunix

标题: 乔布斯访谈录:苹果创新动力之源在哪里? [打印本页]

作者: Aki    时间: 2004-10-19 11:42
标题: 乔布斯访谈录:苹果创新动力之源在哪里?
正当现今市场增长日益变慢,许多技术开发公司都准备勒紧腰带过日子的时候,苹果公司却主张不断创新。

  结合先进的技术以及网上销售音乐的新理念,苹果公司的iPod成为近年最有影响力的技术产品。同时,苹果公司依然保持着制作最美观、最方便使用的个人电脑的良好声誉。

  这些功劳大部分应该属于公司的CEO乔布斯(Steven P. Jobs)。乔布斯于1976年创建苹果公司,1985年他被解除职务,却又于1997年东山再起,重新掌权。《商业周刊》计算机类编辑Peter Burrows最近对做完胰腺癌手术刚刚康复的乔布斯进行了采访,与他探讨了“创新的本质”这一问题。下面是访谈的摘录。

  问:苹果公司一向被看作一家富有创新能力的公司。但在您重返公司前的那段时间,苹果却有点跟不上潮流了,到底是怎么一回事呢?
  答:当我和Steve Wozniak在六十年代末七十年代初为HP公司工作的时候,我们就讨论过作为一家技术公司应该怎么运作。最重要一点,当然是设计出好的产品。苹果公司发明了个人计算机,八年后又发明了图形用户界面。但从那时候开始,公司的步伐就停滞不前了。

  问:苹果公司在您1997年重返前,在创新方面也做了许多的努力,您是怎么看待的呢?
  答:许多公司都拥有大量优秀的工程师和各种人才,但最终都需要有一种向心力使他们团结在一起。否则,你所能得到的只是零零散散的创新技术,却难以把它们整合起来。苹果公司在那段时间正是缺乏这样的一种向心力,使很多有趣的想法没有得到实现。

  问:你们是怎么样做到创新的呢?
  答:我们的员工都是那些乐意去制造最优秀产品的人才。你会很惊讶于他们的工作态度。晚上和周末,他们都加班加点;有时候他们甚至在圣诞节也工作,以保证地球上某一角落某一公司的电脑工具的正常运作,确保公司产品得到优秀的评价。一切都显示出,他们具有十分良好的主人翁精神。

  问:iPod的推出,标志着苹果公司开始涉足电子消费品行业。而您仍然在考虑是否在更大的市场占领一席之地。是不是可以说您正在计划像索尼和三星一样将苹果发展成为产品系列更全面的公司呢?
  答:两家公司在这些年来取得巨大的成就,确实令人赞叹。但苹果公司只是希望能制造出优秀的产品,希望能够对行业有所贡献。这也是我的一个信念。

  问:许多人认为,现在我们处的时代是电子技术多元发展的时代。从驱动器到芯片,从显示屏到网络工具,所有这些都将改变“创新的本质”。创新不再是指发明某样东西,而是变成了一种艺术,一种通过新的方式把多种电子技术整合起来的艺术。您是怎样认为的呢?
  答:当然了,你不可能发明所有的东西。但产品的主要技术是什么?产品的理念是怎么样的呢?灵感来自于哪里呢?我只能说,1.8英吋硬盘并不是为iPod而发明,也不是iPod的主要技术(但灵感却来源于此)。

  问:您是怎么把创新的理念系统化的呢?
  答:所谓的系统化根本不存在。创新的理念可能来自于走廊上的一次碰面,可能来自于晚上十点的一次电话交流,也可能来自于一个为分享新创意而召开的临时会议。
在创新的同时还必须懂得说“不”,以免过犹不及。我们总是计划打入新的市场,但却必须懂得说“不”才可以把精力集中到最重要的地方。

  问:对于苹果的创新,您做了多少工作呢?
  答:我的大部分时间都花在前瞻性的工作上。(在我们的高层管理队伍中)有很多优秀的人才,我可以把公司一半的日常工作交给他们,使得我可以把时间放在其他方面,例如我会把更多时间放在销售工作上。每星期,我还会花两到三个小时与正在开发iLife应用程序的OSX小组会面。

  问:您现在是以兼职的身份在苹果工作,您有打算做回全职的CEO吗?
  答:有的。这是我患了癌症后的一个最明确的决定。我热爱我的生命,我热爱我的工作。我的社交不多也不喜欢开会。我喜欢跟我的家人在一起,我喜欢管理苹果公司和Pixar。能够拥有现在的工作,我觉得自己很幸运。
作者: youknowwho    时间: 2004-10-25 01:45
标题: 乔布斯访谈录:苹果创新动力之源在哪里?
October 12, 2004
The Seed of Apple's Innovation

CEO Steve Jobs says among other practices, it's "saying no to 1,000
things" so as to concentrate on the "really important" creations

In an era when most technology outfits have tightened their belts to
adapt to a slower-growing market, one company stands out for forging
ahead on innovation: Apple Computer (AAPL ). Others have slashed R&D
and focused on incremental advances to existing product lines. Not
Apple.

By combining technical knowhow with a new concept for how to sell
music online, Apple's iPod music player has become the most
influential new tech product in years. At the same time, Apple has
maintained its reputation for making the most elegant, easy-to-use
desktop computers as well.

Much of the credit for this performance is attributed to Chief
Executive Steven P. Jobs, who founded Apple in 1976 -- but was ousted
in 1985 before making a triumphant return in 1997. BusinessWeek
Computer Editor Peter Burrows recently talked about the nature of
innovation with Jobs, who is back to work part-time after recovering
from pancreatic cancer surgery. Here are edited excerpts of their
conversation:

Q: Apple has long been an innovative place with lots of smart,
passionate engineers. But it seemed to fall off the map in the years
before you returned in 1997. What happened?
A: Let's start at the beginning. Both [Apple co-founder] Steve Wozniak
and I -- and I think I can speak for Woz -- got our view of what a
technology company should be while working for Hewlett-Packard (HPQ )
in the late 1960s and early 1970s. And the first rule over there was
to build great products. Well, Apple invented the PC as we know it,
and then it invented the graphical user interface as we know it eight
years later [with the introduction of the Mac]. But then, the company
had a decade in which it took a nap.

Q: What can we learn from Apple's struggle to innovate during the
decade before you returned in 1997?
A: You need a very product-oriented culture, even in a technology
company. Lots of companies have tons of great engineers and smart
people. But ultimately, there needs to be some gravitational force
that pulls it all together. Otherwise, you can get great pieces of
technology all floating around the universe. But it doesn't add up to
much. That's what was missing at Apple for a while. There were bits
and pieces of interesting things floating around, but not that
gravitational pull.

People always ask me why did Apple really fail for those years, and
it's easy to blame it on certain people or personalities. Certainly,
there was some of that. But there's a far more insightful way to think
about it. Apple had a monopoly on the graphical user interface for
almost 10 years. That's a long time. And how are monopolies lost?
Think about it. Some very good product people invent some very good
products, and the company achieves a monopoly.

But after that, the product people aren't the ones that drive the
company forward anymore. It's the marketing guys or the ones who
expand the business into Latin America or whatever. Because what's the
point of focusing on making the product even better when the only
company you can take business from is yourself?

So a different group of people start to move up. And who usually ends
up running the show? The sales guy. John Akers at IBM (IBM ) is the
consummate example. Then one day, the monopoly expires for whatever
reason. But by then the best product people have left, or they're no
longer listened to. And so the company goes through this tumultuous
time, and it either survives or it doesn't.

Q: Is this common in the industry?
A: Look at Microsoft (MSFT ) -- who's running Microsoft?

Q: Steve Ballmer.
A: Right, the sales guy. Case closed. And that's what happened at
Apple, as well.

Q: How did Apple recapture its innovative spark?
A: I used to be the youngest guy in every meeting I was in, and now
I'm usually the oldest. And the older I get, the more I'm convinced
that motives make so much difference. HP's primary goal was to make
great products. And our primary goal here is to make the world's best
PCs -- not to be the biggest or the richest.

We have a second goal, which is to always make a profit -- both to
make some money but also so we can keep making those great products.
For a time, those goals got flipped at Apple, and that subtle change
made all the difference. When I got back, we had to make it a product
company again.

Q: How do you manage for innovation?
A: We hire people who want to make the best things in the world. You'd
be surprised how hard people work around here. They work nights and
weekends, sometimes not seeing their families for a while. Sometimes
people work through Christmas to make sure the tooling is just right
at some factory in some corner of the world so our product comes out
the best it can be. People care so much, and it shows.

I get asked a lot why Apple's customers are so loyal. It's not because
they belong to the Church of Mac! That's ridiculous.

It's because when you buy our products, and three months later you get
stuck on something, you quickly figure out [how to get past it]. And
you think, "Wow, someone over there at Apple actually thought of
this!" And then three months later you try to do something you hadn't
tried before, and it works, and you think "Hey, they thought of that,
too." And then six months later it happens again. There's almost no
product in the world that you have that experience with, but you have
it with a Mac. And you have it with an iPod.

Q: What's the CEOs role in all of this?
A: I don't know. Head janitor?

Q: Seriously, a lot of people give you much of the credit. How much of
it is you?
A: Look, I was very lucky to have grown up with this industry. I did
everything in the early days -- documentation, sales, supply chain,
sweeping the floors, buying chips, you name it. I put computers
together with my own two hands. And as the industry grew up, I kept on
doing it.

Not everyone knows it, but three months after I came back to Apple, my
chief operating guy quit. I couldn't find anyone internally or
elsewhere that knew as much as he did, or as I did. So I did that job
for nine months before I found someone I saw eye-to-eye with, and that
was Tim Cook. And he has been here ever since.

Of course, I didn't tell anyone because I already had two jobs [CEO of
Apple and of movie maker Pixar Animation Studios (PIXR )] and didn't
want people to worry about whether I could handle three [jobs]. But
after Tim came on board, we basically reinvented the logistics of the
PC business. We've been doing better than Dell (DELL ) [in terms of
some metrics such as inventory] for five years now!

Q: With the iPod, Apple moved beyond the PC into consumer electronics.
But you're still considered a niche player that picks its spots in
bigger markets. Will you try to expand to become a more full-line
player, like a Sony (SNE ) or Samsung?
A: The fact that you're comparing us to Sony is a statement in itself.
I'm flattered. We really respect those guys and what they've
accomplished over the years. But we're just trying to make great
products. We do things where we feel we can make a significant
contribution. That's one of my other beliefs.

I've always wanted to own and control the primary technology in
everything we do. Take audio. For years, the primary technology was
the [marking mechanism] inside a CD or a DVD player. But we became
convinced that software was going to be the primary technology, and
we're a pretty good software company.

So we developed iTunes [Apple's music jukebox software that later
morphed into the iTunes Music Store]. We're a good hardware company,
too, but we're really good at software. So that led us to believe that
we had a chance to reinvent the music business, and we did.

Q: Many people say we're in a period in which advances in various
digital technologies -- from drives to chips to screens to networking
gear -- is going to change the nature of innovation. Rather than
inventing something from scratch, innovation will be the art of
putting all of these capabilities together in new ways.
A: Of course, you're never going to invent everything. But what's the
primary technology? And what's the concept of the product? Where does
the conceptualization come from? I guarantee the 1.8-inch hard drive
was not invented for iPods. But that's not the primary technology in
an iPod.

Q: How do you systematize innovation?
A: The system is that there is no system. That doesn't mean we don't
have process. Apple is a very disciplined company, and we have great
processes. But that's not what it's about. Process makes you more
efficient.

But innovation comes from people meeting up in the hallways or calling
each other at 10:30 at night with a new idea, or because they realized
something that shoots holes in how we've been thinking about a
problem. It's ad hoc meetings of six people called by someone who
thinks he has figured out the coolest new thing ever and who wants to
know what other people think of his idea.

And it comes from saying no to 1,000 things to make sure we don't get
on the wrong track or try to do too much. We're always thinking about
new markets we could enter, but it's only by saying no that you can
concentrate on the things that are really important.

Q: How much do you have to do with Apple's innovations?
A: We go back and forth a lot as we work on our projects. And we've
got such great people [in the top executive team] that I've been able
to move about half of the day-to-day management of the company to
them, so I can spend half my time on the new stuff, like the retail
effort. I spent and continue to spend a lot of time on that. And I
meet weekly for two or three hours with my OS X team. And there's the
group doing our iLife applications.

So I get to spend my time on the forward-looking stuff. My top
executives take half the other work off my plate. They love it, and I
love it.

Q: So the key is to have good people with passion for excellence.
A: When I got back here, Apple had forgotten who we were. Remember
that "Think Different" ad campaign we ran [featuring great innovators
from Einstein to Muhammad Ali to Gandhi]. It was certainly for
customers to some degree, but it was even more for Apple itself.

You can tell a lot about a person by who his or her heroes are. That
ad was to remind us of who our heroes are and who we are. We forgot
that for a while. Companies sometimes forget who they are. Sometimes
they remember again, and sometimes they don't.

Fortunately, we woke up. And we're on a really good track. We may not
be the richest guy in the graveyard at the end of the day, but we're
the best at what we do. And Apple is doing the best work in its
history. I really believe that. And there's a lot more coming.

Q: You're back at work on a part-time basis. Are you going to come
back full-time?
A: Yes. That was one of the things that came out most clearly from
this whole experience [with cancer]. I realized that I love my life. I
really do. I've got the greatest family in the world, and I've got my
work. And that's pretty much all I do. I don't socialize much or go to
conferences. I love my family, and I love running Apple, and I love
Pixar. And I get to do that. I'm very lucky.
作者: zonzi    时间: 2004-10-28 23:51
标题: 乔布斯访谈录:苹果创新动力之源在哪里?
steve jobs患了癌症了吗?真的还是假的啊????




欢迎光临 Chinaunix (http://bbs.chinaunix.net/) Powered by Discuz! X3.2