去伪存真——品悟C的优雅与严谨（获奖名单已公布-2012-10-30）

ran3guns

回复 1# send_linux


提几个臭屁建议：
1. 应该在前沿里说明阅读适合本书的对象。
   我很怀疑， 这本书对一个真正在编码的程序员有多大帮助？
2. 感觉样式设计不简洁， 看着不是很舒服（居然还有难易度， 学习时间， 这是24小时精通c语言吗）。
3. 代码排版没法看。
   比如缩进， 2个字节！ 真想说， 讲了500页， 都不如教会代码缩进用8个字节重要！
   代码前面可以用行号， 讲解就不用再重复代码了， 这样能薄点吧。
4. 建议做个投票， 看看读过本书的人觉得有帮组的有多少。

ran3guns

回复 291# sacry


    为了代码的阅读性。

    而且8个字节， 两层缩进就满行。 如果再所就要这行， 强制你简化代码， 减少嵌套。

ran3guns

回复 293# sacry


    这个应该是个人风格的问题，没有哪个更好。 要是非得要什么说服力，linux内核编程风格明确指定了8字符缩进， 也说明了原因。

Chapter 1: Indentation
Tabs are 8 characters, and thus indentations are also 8 characters.
There are heretic movements that try to make indentations 4 (or even 2!)
characters deep, and that is akin to trying to define the value of PI to
be 3.
Rationale: The whole idea behind indentation is to clearly define where
a block of control starts and ends.  Especially when you've been looking
at your screen for 20 straight hours, you'll find it a lot easier to see
how the indentation works if you have large indentations.
Now, some people will claim that having 8-character indentations makes
the code move too far to the right, and makes it hard to read on a
80-character terminal screen.  The answer to that is that if you need
more than 3 levels of indentation, you're screwed anyway, and should fix
your program.
In short, 8-char indents make things easier to read, and have the added
benefit of warning you when you're nesting your functions too deep.
Heed that warning.

那句过分的话，是因为2个字符缩进代码， 拿给一个陌生人看， 人家都不带理你的。