免费注册 查看新帖 |

Chinaunix

  平台 论坛 博客 文库
最近访问板块 发新帖
查看: 1052 | 回复: 0

java中的transient(转载) [复制链接]

论坛徽章:
0
发表于 2007-09-12 09:27 |显示全部楼层
Java中的transient
    改bug,发现一个保留字transient。很奇怪,从来没见过,也从来没用过。
    用google查了一把,大概意思是:Java语言的关键字,用来表示一个域不是该对象串行化的一部分。当一个对象被串行化的时候,transient型变量的值不包括在串行化的表示中,然而非transient型的变量是被包括进去的。还是不大明白。
    后来,终于搜到这篇文章,写得很详细。
Be Careful With Transient Data
    怕万一这篇文章链接失效,收藏起来。
Be Careful With Transient Data
   
    终于明白了。
    当串行化某个对象时,如果该对象的某个变量是transient,那么这个变量不会被串行化进去。也就是说,假设某个类的成员变量是transient,那么当通过ObjectOutputStream把这个类的某个实例保存到磁盘上时,实际上transient变量的值是不会保存的。因为当从磁盘中读出这个对象的时候,对象的该变量会没有被赋值。
    另外这篇文章还提到,当从磁盘中读出某个类的实例时,实际上并不会执行这个类的构造函数,而是读取这个类的实例的状态,并且把这个状态付给这个类的对象。这点我以前似乎不知道。
Trackback:
http://tb.blog.csdn.net/TrackBack.aspx?PostId=1064847


Be Careful With Transient Data

(原文来自
http://www.devx.com/tips/Tip/13726
)
Expertise: Intermediate
Language: Java
January 28, 2000
Be Careful With Transient Data
Java's serialization provides an elegant, and easy to use mechanism for making an object's state persistent. While controlling object serialization, we might have a particular object data member that we do not want the serialization mechanism to save.
To turn off serialization on a certain field of an object, we tag that field of the class of our object with the Java's "transient" keyword. This, to low-level parts of the Java virtual machine, is an indication that the transient variable is not part of the persistent state of an object.
First, let's have some backgrounder code with Java's serialization.
Suppose we define a class as:

public class LoggingInfo implements java.io.Serializable
{
    private Date loggingDate = new Date();
    private String uid;
    private transient String pwd;
   
    LoggingInfo(String user, String password)
    {
        uid = user;
        pwd = password;
    }
    public String toString()
    {
        String password=null;
        if(pwd == null)
        {
        password = "NOT SET";
        }
        else
        {
            password = pwd;
        }
        return "logon info: \n   " + "user: " + uid +
            "\n   logging date : " + loggingDate.toString() +
            "\n   password: " + password;
    }
}
Now we can create an instance of this class and serialize it, and write the serialized object to disk as in:
LoggingInfo logInfo = new LoggingInfo("MIKE", "MECHANICS");
System.out.println(logInfo.toString());
try
{
   ObjectOutputStream o = new ObjectOutputStream(
                new FileOutputStream("logInfo.out"));
   o.writeObject(logInfo);
   o.close();
}
catch(Exception e) {//deal with exception}
To read the object back, we can write
try
{
   ObjectInputStream in =new ObjectInputStream(
                new FileInputStream("logInfo.out"));
   LoggingInfo logInfo = (LoggingInfo)in.readObject();
   System.out.println(logInfo.toString());
}
catch(Exception e) {//deal with exception}
If we run this code, we notice that the read-back object prints password as "NOT SET". This is exactly the effect we should have expected when we declared the pwd field as transient.
Now, let's see a potential problem that careless treatment of transient fields may cause. Suppose we modify our class definition and provide default values for the transient field, say we write:

public class GuestLoggingInfo implements java.io.Serializable
{
    private Date loggingDate = new Date();
    private String uid;
    private transient String pwd;
   
    GuestLoggingInfo()
    {
        uid = "guest";
        pwd = "guest";
    }
    public String toString()
    {
        //same as above
     }
}
Now, if we serialize an instance of GuestLoggingInfo, write it to disk, and read it back, we still see that the read-back object prints password as "NOT SET". In effect, the process of reading back (de-serializing) totally ignores the constructor of GuestLoggingInfo. So what happened?
The answer lies in the fact that the initialization code is not called because we are not initializing, in other words, we are not constructing a brand new object, but loading back the persistent state of an object of a class, and assigning that state to another object of the same class. Declaring the pwd field as transient, excludes the data for that field from the persistent state of our object. Then, upon de-serialization, since there is no data preserved for the pwd field, the field gets Java's default value for its type (null for String).
So, if you mark a field of an object as transient, and write that object to disk, expect to have the default value of the type of that field when you de-serialize the object, and not the actual value that the field had before its state was serialized. If a default value (or any meaningful value) is essential for a transient field of a de-serialized object, you have to assign it yourself either directly (if the field is public) or via a setter method.
Behrouz Fallahi
Trackback: http://tb.blog.csdn.net/TrackBack.aspx?PostId=1064817


本文来自ChinaUnix博客,如果查看原文请点:http://blog.chinaunix.net/u/22516/showart_380029.html
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则 发表回复

  

北京盛拓优讯信息技术有限公司. 版权所有 京ICP备16024965号-6 北京市公安局海淀分局网监中心备案编号:11010802020122 niuxiaotong@pcpop.com 17352615567
未成年举报专区
中国互联网协会会员  联系我们:huangweiwei@itpub.net
感谢所有关心和支持过ChinaUnix的朋友们 转载本站内容请注明原作者名及出处

清除 Cookies - ChinaUnix - Archiver - WAP - TOP