求教erlang snmp的例子

laputa73

想尝试一下erlang的snmp采集,不用agent.
使用自带的ex2例子
启动本机的snmp agent,并用snmpwalk测试没问题

1. D:\toolgreen\snmp\snmp>snmpwalk -v1 -c public 127.0.0.1 sysName
   
2. SNMPv2-MIB::sysName.0 = STRING: zynb0411

复制代码

snmp_ex2_simple_standard_test:start()
报错

1. 25> snmp_ex2_simple_standard_test:start("127.0.0.1:161-v1").
   
2. Command  1 (get-next [1,1]): error
   
3.    {command_failed,not_found}
   
4. Command  2 (get-next [1,3]): error
   
5.    {command_failed,not_found}
   
6. Command  3 (get-next [1,3,6]): error
   
7.    {command_failed,not_found}
   
8. Command  4 (get-next [1,3,6]): error
   
9.    {command_failed,not_found}
   
10. Command  5 (get-next [1,3,6,1,2]): error
    
11.    {command_failed,not_found}
    
12. Command  6 (get-next [1,3,6,1,2,1]): error
    
13.    {command_failed,not_found}
    
14. Command  7 (get-next [1,3,6,1,2,1,1]): error
    
15.    {command_failed,not_found}
    
16. Command  8 (get-next [1,3,6,1,2,1,1,1]): error
    
17.    {command_failed,not_found}
    
18. Command  9 (get [sysDescr,0]): error
    
19.    {command_failed,not_found}
    
20. Command 10 (get [1,3,6,1,2,1,1,1]): error
    
21.    {command_failed,not_found}
    
22. Test completed.
    
23. ok
    
24. 26>

复制代码

单步了一下,报错是在
Reply = (catch snmpm:sync_get_next(?USER, TargetName, Oids)),



请有经验的erlangers指教

arserangel

多核编程, erlang 内置的自动解决的...
不需要你再去处理 snmp 的东东的

laputa73

回复 2# arserangel


    不明白LZ的大神的意思
   您是弄混了SMP和SNMP了吧?

arserangel

回复 3# laputa73


    嗯，哈哈，不好意思啊，我只晚光看了标题，没有看内容，还以为是 smp 呢．．．．
    见笑，见笑．．．　

shijiang1130

shijiang1130

start(Mibs, AgentAddr, AgentConfig) ->
    Conf = [{mibs, Mibs}],
    {ok, _Pid} = snmp_ex2_manager:start_link(Conf),
    snmp_ex2_manager:agent(AgentAddr, AgentConfig),
    simple_standard_test("192.168.1.101:161-v1"),
    snmp_ex2_manager:stop().


    155> snmp_ex2_simple_standard_test:start().
Command  1 (get-next [1,1]): ok
   Hardware: Intel64 Family 6 Model 58 Stepping 9 AT/AT COMPATIBLE - Software: Windows Version 6.1 (Build 7601 Multiprocessor Free)
Command  2 (get-next [1,3]): ok
   Hardware: Intel64 Family 6 Model 58 Stepping 9 AT/AT COMPATIBLE - Software: Windows Version 6.1 (Build 7601 Multiprocessor Free)
Command  3 (get-next [1,3,6]): ok
   Hardware: Intel64 Family 6 Model 58 Stepping 9 AT/AT COMPATIBLE - Software: Windows Version 6.1 (Build 7601 Multiprocessor Free)
Command  4 (get-next [1,3,6]): ok
   Hardware: Intel64 Family 6 Model 58 Stepping 9 AT/AT COMPATIBLE - Software: Windows Version 6.1 (Build 7601 Multiprocessor Free)
Command  5 (get-next [1,3,6,1,2]): ok
   Hardware: Intel64 Family 6 Model 58 Stepping 9 AT/AT COMPATIBLE - Software: Windows Version 6.1 (Build 7601 Multiprocessor Free)
Command  6 (get-next [1,3,6,1,2,1]): ok
   Hardware: Intel64 Family 6 Model 58 Stepping 9 AT/AT COMPATIBLE - Software: Windows Version 6.1 (Build 7601 Multiprocessor Free)
Command  7 (get-next [1,3,6,1,2,1,1]): ok
   Hardware: Intel64 Family 6 Model 58 Stepping 9 AT/AT COMPATIBLE - Software: Windows Version 6.1 (Build 7601 Multiprocessor Free)
Command  8 (get-next [1,3,6,1,2,1,1,1]): ok
   Hardware: Intel64 Family 6 Model 58 Stepping 9 AT/AT COMPATIBLE - Software: Windows Version 6.1 (Build 7601 Multiprocessor Free)
Command  9 (get [sysDescr,0]): ok
   Hardware: Intel64 Family 6 Model 58 Stepping 9 AT/AT COMPATIBLE - Software: Windows Version 6.1 (Build 7601 Multiprocessor Free)
Command 10 (get [1,3,6,1,2,1,1,1]): error
   {unexpected_command_result,
       {ok,{noSuchName,1,[{varbind,[1,3,6,1,2,1,1,1],'NULL','NULL',1}]},5000}}
Test completed.
ok
156>

laputa73

回复 6# shijiang1130


    啊,LS怎么可以呢?
    我的怎么就不行啊,{:3_198:}
    我的是64位win7+ Erlang R15B03 (erts-5.9.3.1) [smp:4:4] [async-threads:0]
    有什么机关吗?
    在shell里面要做什么设置吗?

shijiang1130

我把你那行移动到文件里面去了，见标红的那行

laputa73

我崩溃了.
simple_standard_test("127.0.0.1:161-v1"),不行
把127.0.0.1改成实际地址192.168.1.100就可以了...
嗯,好歹可以通过了,后面再仔细研究一下,
这个192.168.1.100:161-v1是个什么定义...

laputa73

回复 8# shijiang1130


    这个是怎么发现的?
    snmp_ex2_simple_standard_test:start({192,168,1,100}).
    simple_standard_test("192.168.1.100:161-v1"),
    这两个格式完全不一样啊
    应该算原例子的bug吧