Perl web framework Mojolicious

albertd

I am learning it now, anybody has any expeirences of this perl web framework. Can you share your thoughts and comments aout it.

Thanks.

2gua

好好的中文不会讲嘛？

zhlong8

顶一下

albertd

回复 2# 2gua


    My computer has no Chinese language input, please ignore my post if it bothers you.

Thanks

perlcrack

Dancer is a little framework and it is very good framework
my group of qq:81087030

albertd

http://code.google.com/p/catz/wiki/FrameworkComparison

Catalyst

Very flexible: Moose can be used to extend controllers, sessions can be handled every way you like, choose almost any templating system and there already a CPAN module to do that
Mature
The most documented Perl MVC framework
Inintial startup on a new project takes some time
Heavyweight with lots of dependencies
Tons of plugins
Gigantic user community
Routing rules are spread to controllers which I don't like
Feature-list is long. What I really like is a natural automatic loading of Models and to access them without a hassle.
Very hard to get the idea behind Chained actions: there are various simple examples but I still don't get it how to use them in my cases
Restart is a real restart: slower than with Mojolicious reload but appears to work in every case

Dancer

Sits nicely between the component-based Catalyst and web-in-a-box Mojolicious
Weights much less than Catalyst
Very easy to start work with
DSL features are a two-sided sword - depends on what you like - I prefer pure Perl against DSL
Has stabilized to the level that can be used in production
Active user community

Mojolicious

Very easy to start work with due to the web-in-a-box design
Excellent dispatcher: route definitions are in one place, they are compact and the routing syntax is very expressive
Lightweight
Has stabilized to the level that can be used in production
Active user community
Enough documentation at least for a user on my level
Nice integrated template engine allowing embedded Perl
Reload is very fast but is not as bullet-proof as Catalyst restart
Development is driven by one main developer - this is both a pro and a con
Lots of nice features to speed up the development and to make developer's life easier (like auto-localization of stash variables in templates)
Simplicity has been taken to extremes: almost everything is accessed thru $self, Catalyst separation between $self and $c might be clearer
Some issues rise due to the fact that when you are running router or before/after hook, you are not running a controller and so $self doesn't provide all the services available for controllers
API changes break things ($self->render(status => 404) became useless and had to be globally replaced with $self->render_not_found)

2gua

回复 4# albertd


    Thanks.

hitsubunnu

Mojolicious::Lite  很不错

兰花仙子

http://mojolicio.us/perldoc
跟所有成功的perl项目一样，mojo的文档很好很全。
这个MVC有点像sinatra和dancer，但功能更丰富，直接支持多种web service接口。
其template系统看起来不如TT。

kingwmj

在这个贴子里发言的都是高手，我来冒充一个。