免费注册 查看新帖 |

Chinaunix

  平台 论坛 博客 文库
最近访问板块 发新帖
查看: 4418 | 回复: 4
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[FreeBSD] U-Boot for Raspberry Pi [复制链接]

论坛徽章:
13
15-16赛季CBA联赛之同曦
日期:2016-01-28 19:52:032015亚冠之北京国安
日期:2015-10-07 14:28:19NBA常规赛纪念章
日期:2015-05-04 22:32:03处女座
日期:2015-01-15 19:45:44卯兔
日期:2014-10-28 16:17:14白羊座
日期:2014-05-24 15:10:46寅虎
日期:2014-05-10 09:50:35白羊座
日期:2014-03-12 20:52:17午马
日期:2014-03-01 08:37:27射手座
日期:2014-02-19 19:26:54子鼠
日期:2013-11-30 09:03:56狮子座
日期:2013-09-08 08:37:52
跳转到指定楼层
1 [收藏(0)] [报告]
发表于 2012-07-19 22:21 |只看该作者 |倒序浏览
本帖最后由 ulovko 于 2012-07-20 06:09 编辑



FROM: http://kernelnomicon.org/?p=133

About Raspberry Pi : http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Raspberry_Pi



NetBSD on the Raspberry Pi
The Raspberry Pi is a pretty recent, cheap ARM-based board, or as the webpage says: ``An ARM GNU/Linux box for $25''.
Shipping with today's Windows-for-embedde-boards operating system (AKA Linux), there's also a port of NetBSD on its way.
Nick Hudson is at it, and he has posted first dmesg output now, showing the machine going to multiuser mode.
The code's not integrated into mainline NetBSD-current yet, but rest assured that that will happen when the code is ripe.
Good work, Nick!

Disclaimer: All opinion expressed here is purely my own. No responsibility is taken for anything.
FROM: http://www.feyrer.de/NetBSD/bx/blosxom.cgi/nb_20120714_0236.html

论坛徽章:
2
亥猪
日期:2014-03-19 16:36:35午马
日期:2014-11-23 23:48:46
2 [报告]
发表于 2012-07-20 02:47 |只看该作者
arm11淘汰了...现在都跟着手机玩cortex了.能效比好得多

论坛徽章:
13
15-16赛季CBA联赛之同曦
日期:2016-01-28 19:52:032015亚冠之北京国安
日期:2015-10-07 14:28:19NBA常规赛纪念章
日期:2015-05-04 22:32:03处女座
日期:2015-01-15 19:45:44卯兔
日期:2014-10-28 16:17:14白羊座
日期:2014-05-24 15:10:46寅虎
日期:2014-05-10 09:50:35白羊座
日期:2014-03-12 20:52:17午马
日期:2014-03-01 08:37:27射手座
日期:2014-02-19 19:26:54子鼠
日期:2013-11-30 09:03:56狮子座
日期:2013-09-08 08:37:52
3 [报告]
发表于 2012-07-20 06:14 |只看该作者
gvim 发表于 2012-07-20 02:47
arm11淘汰了...现在都跟着手机玩cortex了.能效比好得多

多谢版主指教 ^_^

论坛徽章:
0
4 [报告]
发表于 2012-07-20 09:22 |只看该作者
ARM11 vs Cortex A8 vs Cortex A9 - Netbooks processors

You may remember that an Intel executive (one year ago or so) in an interview said that the Internet browsing experience in the iPhone is not that good because an ARM processor is used instead of an Intel Atom. Of course this sentence is a pure provocation since the Atom processors weren't (and still aren't) suitable for handsets: they are too power hungry.
The first iPhones 2G and 3G included a Samsung SoC based on the ARM11 core clocked at about 600MHz, much more power efficient than actual Atoms. On the other hand Atom processors are definetly more powerful than ARM11 processors.
In the past couple of years ARM introduced Cortex A8 and Cortex A9 cores, processors able to reach and potentially beat Intel Atom.

Just to give an example showing how "bad" the ARM11 compared to the new Cortex, I report the peak DMIPS/MHz. It is a clock-per-clock performance indication of the processor (used especially for Marketing purpose)

    ARM11: 1.2 DMIPS/MHz
    ARM Cortex A8: 2.0 DMIPS/MHz
    ARM Cortex A9: 2.5 DMIPS/MHz

There is a huge performance difference between older ARM11 cores and the new ARM Cortex A8 and Cortex A9.

Example of devices using the ARM cores
Apple iPhone 3G uses an ARM11 processor while the iPhone 3GS an ARM Cortex A8.
The ARM Cortex A8 is also used in Qualcom Snapdragon and NXP i.MX515 SoCs.
The first ARM Cortex A9 based SoCs (System on a Chip) are expected in 2010.
Nvidia Tegra 1 is based upon an ARM11 and it's unknown whether or not in Tegra 2 an ARM11 or a Cortex A8 / Cortex A9 will be used.

论坛徽章:
0
5 [报告]
发表于 2012-07-20 17:16 |只看该作者
要玩的话,可以试试
http://beagleboard.org/bone/ 狗骨头小板子
TI的资料很全,源代码开发的也挺好, 不过这芯片还有点贵,1KK的量才是5美金,拿来玩的话没啥
还有个基于OMAP4430, OMAP4460的板子,那个跑起来就更欢快些
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 注册

本版积分规则 发表回复

  

北京盛拓优讯信息技术有限公司. 版权所有 京ICP备16024965号-6 北京市公安局海淀分局网监中心备案编号:11010802020122 niuxiaotong@pcpop.com 17352615567
未成年举报专区
中国互联网协会会员  联系我们:huangweiwei@itpub.net
感谢所有关心和支持过ChinaUnix的朋友们 转载本站内容请注明原作者名及出处

清除 Cookies - ChinaUnix - Archiver - WAP - TOP