- 论坛徽章:
- 0
|
在路由器的Fastethernet 做CBWFQ是有问题的!
经过我反复测试,以前应用于serial 口的cbwqf,在fastethernet等高速网络上做Qos,实际效果非常差,基本上没效果。
你看同样的设定在serial0上,有效果,但是换成fastethernet就没点效果了。
大家有没有高见,我在测试流理整形成2M,再做Qos又有效果了。
大家想想,是不是有别的办法,原因在哪里呢? 是路由的缓冲太小,还是队列对于高速网络没用。
有效果 Router#show run
!
class-map match-any a
match access-group 110
class-map match-any b
match access-group 120
class-map match-any c
match access-group 130
!
!
policy-map qos
class a
priority 1600
set precedence 5
class b
bandwidth 300
set precedence 3
class c
bandwidth 100
set precedence 1
!
interface FastEthernet0/0
ip address 192.168.100.254 255.255.255.0
duplex auto
speed auto
!
interface Serial0
bandwidth 2048
ip address 192.168.5.250 255.255.255.0
max-reserved-bandwidth 100
service-policy output qos
!
ip classless
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.5.254
access-list 110 permit ip host 192.168.100.2 host 192.168.5.1
access-list 120 permit ip host 192.168.100.3 host 192.168.5.1
access-list 130 permit ip any any
Router#
没效果 Router#show run
!
class-map match-any a
match access-group 110
class-map match-any b
match access-group 120
class-map match-any c
match access-group 130
!
!
policy-map qos
class a
priority 32000
set precedence 5
class b
bandwidth 40000
set precedence 3
class c
bandwidth 20000
set precedence 1
!
interface FastEthernet0/0
ip address 192.168.100.254 255.255.255.0
duplex auto
speed auto
!
interface FastEthernet0/1
bandwidth 102048
ip address 192.168.5.250 255.255.255.0
max-reserved-bandwidth 100
service-policy output qos
!
ip classless
ip route 0.0.0.0 0.0.0.0 192.168.5.254
access-list 110 permit ip host 192.168.100.2 host 192.168.5.1
access-list 120 permit ip host 192.168.100.3 host 192.168.5.1
access-list 130 permit ip any any
Router# |
|