为什么啥都要证明呢？那么多证明谁来证明一下先有鸡还是先有蛋啊？

lb_bn

你怎么不理解他话的另一个意思呢，很多事必须当代就得解决。。。

YaoFei

原帖由 JohnBull 于 2009-5-9 20:35 发表


对的！
不过很多感冒药（包括中成药）中含脱敏药，它的嗜睡作用可以帮你睡个好觉...

比如著名的“维C银翘片”，含有剂量上限的扑热息痛和扑尔敏。如果同时吃其他感冒药，很容易由于过量产生不良反应。

nicozhou

原帖由 waker 于 2009-5-9 13:20 发表
有蛋没鸡和有鸡没蛋的结果都是干着紧，解决办法通常用手

有鸡没蛋是太监，有蛋没鸡是啥？

waker

原帖由 nicozhou 于 2009-5-9 21:29 发表



有鸡没蛋是太监，有蛋没鸡是啥？

此鸡指的是在中国最黑暗的时代几乎失传而随着科学春天的到来又飞速发展的一种"职业"

xy_god

原帖由 YaoFei 于 2009-5-9 18:19 发表



这跟“抛弃基础” “知觉消失”有啥关系？你的逻辑太混乱了。

不管是怎样的观察，要通过适当的方法去芜存菁，消除各种主观因素和人为因素引入的误差。

至于验证，学问很大。

考虑到生命现象的复 ...

你哪儿来的99：1的数据？
千百年来的实践造就了现在的人类社会，千百年来的生活造就了中国人对中医的信任。
这个是无法改变的事实，不是你那个僵化的“证伪”所能改变的。

tom_xx_hu@yahoo

原帖由 xy_god 于 2009-5-9 17:25 发表
正因为复杂，那些实用的，经验性的理论才在实践中显得更为宝贵。

没错。可是我还是觉得西医才更“实用”。
屁股生个疮，西医给你彻底清洗消毒再消炎，包扎好了避免重复感染，好得很；中医麻烦了，他阴阳五行全上搞得你云里雾里，从你的五脏六腑从头到脚统统调理一个遍，开的药方那是天上飞的地上跑的阴沟里钻的厕所里爬的，一天三服药，每服熬两个小时，这一天你就什么别的也别干了。少则十天，多则数月下来，最后疗效如何？还看你的‘缘分"。

antonym55

Egg came first

LONDON, England -- It's a question that has baffled scientists, academics and pub bores through the ages: What came first, the chicken or the egg?

Now a team made up of a geneticist, philosopher and chicken farmer claim to have found an answer. It was the egg.

Put simply, the reason is down to the fact that genetic material does not change during an animal's life.

Therefore the first bird that evolved into what we would call a chicken, probably in prehistoric times, must have first existed as an embryo inside an egg.

Professor John Brookfield, a specialist in evolutionary genetics at the University of Nottingham, told the UK Press Association the pecking order was clear.

The living organism inside the eggshell would have had the same DNA as the chicken it would develop into, he said.

"Therefore, the first living thing which we could say unequivocally was a member of the species would be this first egg," he added. "So, I would conclude that the egg came first."

The same conclusion was reached by his fellow "eggsperts" Professor David Papineau, of King's College London, and poultry farmer Charles Bourns.

Mr Papineau, an expert in the philosophy of science, agreed that the first chicken came from an egg and that proves there were chicken eggs before chickens.

He told PA people were mistaken if they argued that the mutant egg belonged to the "non-chicken" bird parents.

"I would argue it is a chicken egg if it has a chicken in it," he said.

"If a kangaroo laid an egg from which an ostrich hatched, that would surely be an ostrich egg, not a kangaroo egg."

Bourns, chairman of trade body Great British Chicken, said he was also firmly in the pro-egg camp.

He said: "Eggs were around long before the first chicken arrived. Of course, they may not have been chicken eggs as we see them today, but they were eggs."

The debate, which may come as a relief to those with argumentative relatives, was organized by Disney to promote the release of the film "Chicken Little" on DVD.

http://www.cnn.com/2006/TECH/science/05/26/chicken.egg/

mgqw

原帖由 tom_xx_hu@yahoo 于 2009-5-10 11:41 发表

没错。可是我还是觉得西医才更“实用”。
屁股生个疮，西医给你彻底清洗消毒再消炎，包扎好了避免重复感染，好得很；中医麻烦了，他阴阳五行全上搞得你云里雾里，从你的五脏六腑从头到脚统统调理一个遍，开的 ...

    如果有中医给你看病说阴阳五行全上搞得你云里雾里，从你的五脏六腑从头到脚统统调理一个遍，那么恭喜你看到电线杆上的骗人老军医了。真正的中医看病绝对不会给你说阴阳五行全上搞得你云里雾里，到底怎么分析病的你自己以后去看了就晓得了。 麻烦着中医看病去正规的药房或者是当地有名气的中医看病，就如同大家都晓得去正规医院比去路边黑诊所看病人放心。

    首先我怀疑你看过中医没有：首先中药基本都是一天服药两次，而不是三次，别想当然的把一天的服药次数等同于一天的吃饭次数。

    其次： 如果有时间追求最佳效果可以自己在家慢慢煎。如果没时间的话可以给几快钱让药房代煎药，只要不是特小特原始的药房都有煎药设备，一次性全部给你煎好全部用真空包装袋密封起来，你所要做的只是把煎药提回去放在冰箱里面，按时服药一天两次一次一包煎药即可。

    中医很多地方也在与时俱进，请乱喷中医的人稍微有点点常识，说出这样没有常识的话只会让人觉得你无知。

[ 本帖最后由 mgqw 于 2009-5-10 16:11 编辑 ]

jeanlove

原帖由 枫影谁用了 于 2009-5-9 12:44 发表
很多事情是不需要证明的(起码目前不需要,就像邓小平说的，有些事情应该给下一代解决 )，搞那么多证明题干啥啊，就是口水战啊。

LZ，你的话题是一个坑。

"先有地球还是先有月球"是一个命题，因为两者的概念的定义不互为因果，才能有"有意义的"证明。

而鸡和蛋的定义是递归关系，互为因果，所以这种命题，要证明也只能证明是个伪命题，就像"先有大还是先有小一样"。这种命题是伪命题。

谢谢。

dream_land

鸡和蛋的问题已经有人证明了，强吧？